You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Semiotic Pedagogy and Art Education
Deborah L. Smith-Shank
Studies in Art Education
Vol. 36, No. 4 (Summer, 1995), pp. 233-241
Published by: National Art Education Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1320937
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Semiotic signs, Art education, Pedagogy, Learning, Semiotics, Teachers, Art teachers, Students, History instruction, Social semiotics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Charles Sanders Peirce, father of American semiotics and pragmatism, insisted that educational institutions were places for learning and not for instruction. If Peirce's argument is accepted, then it is necessary to redefine the roles of teachers, students, and subject matters in relation to learning. Semiotics, with its emphasis on codes, signs, and their interactions, is especially appropriate for rethinking the learning and teaching process in art, as well as parameters which may constrain the art education field. This paper identifies three basic semiotic issues and describes classroom activities that show relevance to an alternative pedagogy in art education.
Studies in Art Education © 1995 National Art Education Association