Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Ultra Vires Corporation Leases

Edward Avery Harriman
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 14, No. 5 (Jan., 1901), pp. 332-352
DOI: 10.2307/1322713
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1322713
Page Count: 21
Subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Ultra Vires Corporation Leases
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 88 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    Corporations, § 648.
  • 2
    Ib. § 649
  • 3
    139 U. S. 24 (1891).
  • 1
    139 U. S. 59, 60 (1891).
  • 2
    L. R. 7 H. L. 653 (1875).
  • 3
    Ib. 672.
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Head v. Providence Insurance Co., 2 Cranch, 127, 169 (1804)
    • Bank of U. S v. Dandridge, 12 Wheaton, 64,99 (1827).
  • 5
    Pollock, Contracts, Appendix D.
  • 8
    National Home Building Ass'n v. Bank, 181 Ill. 35, 45 (1899).
  • 9
    Contracts (2d Am. ed.), 121.
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Ib.
    • Morawetz, Corporations, § 648
    • George Wharton Pepper, 9HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 255.
  • 2
    L. R. 7 H. L. 653 (1875).
  • 3
    101 U. S. 71 (1879).
  • 4
    Ib. 82.
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman Co., 139 U. S. 24, 48 (1891)
    • McCormick v. Market Bank, 165 U. S. 538, 550 (1897)
    • De La Vergne Co. v. German Savings Institution, 175 U. S. 40, 59 (1899).
  • 2
    Riche v. Ashbury Co., L. R. 9 Ex. 224, 264 (1874).
  • 3
    National Bank v. Matthews, 98 U. S. 621 (1878).
  • 4
    McCormick v. Market Bank, 165 U. S. 538 (1897).
  • 5
    Sioux City R. Co. v. North American Trust Co., 173 U. S. 99, 112 (1899).
  • 6
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Thomas v. Railroad Co., 101 U. S. 71 (1879)
    • Pennsylvania R. v. St. Louis, etc. R., 118 U. S. 290 (1886)
    • Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Oregonian Rail- way Co., 130 U. S. 1 (1889)
    • Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman Co., 139 U. S. 24 (1891)
    • McCormick v. Market Bank, 165 U. S. 538 (1897)
    • Brunswick Gaslight Co. v. United Gas Co., 85 Me. 532 (1893).
    • De La Vergne Co. v. German Savings Inst., 175 U. S. 40, 59 (1899).
  • 7
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Pennsylvania R. Co. v. St. Louis, etc. R., 118 U. S. 290 (1886)
    • St. Louis, etc. R. Co. v. Terre Haute, etc. R. Co., 145 U. S. 393 (1892).
  • 8
    Boston, Concord, etc. R. Co. v. Boston & L. R. Co., 65 N. H. 393 (1888).
  • 1
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Camden, etc. R. v. May's Landing, etc. R., 48 N. J. 530 (1886)
    • Corpus Christi v. Central Wharf Co., 8 Tex. Civ. App. 94
    • 27 S. W. 803 (1894)
    • Heims Brewing Co. v. Flannery, 137 Ill. 309 (1891)
    • Bath Gas Light Co. v. Claffy, 151 N. Y. 24 (1896).
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • St. Louis, etc. R. v. Terre Haute, etc. R., 145 U. S. 393 (1892)
    • supra, note 6
    • page 336, supra.
  • 3
    National Home Building Ass'n v. Bank, 181 Ill. 35 (1899).
  • 4
    Bigelow, Estoppel (5th ed.), 604, 605.
  • 5
    Corporations, vol. vii. § 8314 (1899).
  • 1
    Seeberger v. McCormick, 178 Ill. 404 (1899).
  • 2
    Pennsylvania Co. v. St. Louis, etc. R., 118 U. S. 318 (1898).
  • 3
    171 U. S. 138 (1898).
  • 4
    2American Law Register, N. S.299 (1865).
  • 5
    Railway Co. v. Iron Co., 46 Ohio St. 44 (1888).
  • 6
    Union Bridge Co. v. Troy, etc. R., 7 Lans. 240 (1872).
  • 1
    Peck v. Burr, 10 N. Y. 294 (1851).
  • 2
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. St. Joseph, etc. R., 2 Fed. Rep. 117 (1880)
    • Green- ville Compress Co. v. Planters' Compress Co., 70 Miss. 669 (1893)
    • Nashua, etc. R. v. Boston, etc. R., 164 Mass. 222 (1895)
    • Manchester, etc. R. v. Concord R., 66 N. H. 100 (1890).
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Brooks v. Martin, 2 Wall. 70 (1863)
    • Planters' Bank v. Union Bank, 16 Wall. 483 (1872).
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Cowell v. Springs Co., 100 U. S. 55 (1879)
    • Jones v. Habersham, 107 U. S. 174, 188 (1882)
    • Fritts v. Palmer, 132 U. S. 282 (1889).
  • 3
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Thomas v. Railroad Co., 101 U. S. 83, Miller J.
    • Branch v. Jesup, 106 U. S. 478, Bradley, J.
    • Pennsylvania R. v. St. Louis, etc. R., 118 U. S. 290, Miller, J.
    • Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman Co., 139 U. S. 24, Gray, J.
    • Oregon R. v. Oregonian R., 130 U. S. 1, 23, Miller, J.
    • Snell v. Chicago, 152 U. S. 199, Brewer, J.
    • Bruns- wick Gaslight Co. v. United Gas Co., 85 Me. 532.
  • 1
    1 McCrary, 188 (1880).
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Western Union Tel. Co. v. Union Pacific R., 1 McCrary, 558 (1880)
    • Western Union Tel. Co. v. Burlington, etc. R., 3 McCrary, 130 (1882).
    • 1 McCrary, 581.
  • 3
    Central Branch U. P. R. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 1 McCrary, 551 (1880).
  • 4
    86 Tenn. 598.
  • 1
    88 Ala. 570.
  • 2
    139 U. S. 24, 60.
  • 3
    Salt Lake City v. Hollister, 118 U. S. 263.
  • 4
    171 U. S. 138, 159 (1898).
  • 1
    101 U. S. 71.
  • 2
    118 U. S. 290, 317.
  • 3
    Newcastle Northern R. v. Simpson, 21 Fed. Rep. 533 (1884)
  • 5
    145 U. S. 393 (1892).
  • 1
    145 U. S. 407 (1892).
  • 2
    66 N. H. 100
  • 3
    Quasi-Contracts, 259.
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 9HARVARD LAW REV. 257
    • 2 American Law Reg. (N. S.) 296.
  • 2
    Contracts (8th ed.), 217.
  • 3
    Digest of Contracts, 673.
  • 4
    Singer Mfg. Co. v. Draper, 52 S. W. 879, Tenn. (1899).
  • 6
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Block v. Darling, 140 U. S. 234 (1891)
    • New Castle Northern R. v. Simpson, 21 Fed. Rep. 533, 537 (1884)
    • Tate v. Commercial B'l'd'g Ass'n, 33 S. E. 382 (1899), Va.
    • Story, Equity Jur. § 298.
  • 6
    Equity Jur. § 298.
  • 7
    Union Bridge Co. v. Troy, etc. R., 7 Lans. 240 (1872).
  • 8
    145 U. S. 393.
  • 1
    Olcott v. International, etc. R., 28 S. W. 728 (1894), Tex. Civ. App.
  • 2
    This reference contains 10 citations:
    • Brooks v. Martin, 2 Wall. 70
    • Planters' Bank v. Union Bank, 16 Wall. 483
    • Block v. Darling, 140 U. S. 234
    • Spring Co. v. Knowlton, 103 U. S. 49
    • Herman v. Jeuchner, 15 Q. B. D. 561
    • Re Great Berlin Stbt. Co., 26 C. D. 616
    • Kearley v. Thompson, 24 Q. B. D. 742
    • Kirkpatrick v. Clark, 132 Ill. 342
    • St. Louis, etc. R. v. Terre Haute, etc. R., 145 U. S. 393
    • Union Bridge Co. v. Troy, etc. R., 7 Lans. 240.
  • 3
    2 American Law Reg. (N. S.) 306.
  • 4
    Ib. 296.
  • 1
    Union Bridge Co. v. Troy, etc. R., 7.Lans. 240 (1872).
  • 2
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Great Northwestern Central R. v. Charlebois, 1899, A. C. 114 (P. C.)
    • Olcott v. International, etc. R., 28 S. W. 728 (1894), Tex. Civ. App.
  • 3
    Board of Commissioners v. Lafayette, etc. R., 50 Ind. 85 (1875).
  • 4
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • St. Louis, etc. R. v. Terre Haute, etc. R., 145 U. S., 393 (1892)
    • Boston, Con- cord, etc. R. v. Boston & Lowell R., 65 N. H. 393 (1888)
    • Olcott v. Intemational, etc. R., 28 S. W. 728 (1894), Tex. Civ. App.
  • 5
    Memphis, etc. R. v. Grayson, 88 Ala. 570 (1890).
  • 6
    Auburn Academy v. Strong, Hopk. Ch. 278 (1824).
  • 7
    Detroit v. Detroit City R., 56 Fed. Rep. 868, 892 (1893).
  • 1
    Mallory v. Hanaur Oil Works, 86 Tenn. 598 (1888).
  • 2
    Olcott v. International, etc. R., 28 S. W. 728 (1894), Tex. Civ. App.
  • 3
    145 U. S. 393.
  • 4
    Ib. 409.
  • 5
    171 U. S. 138.
  • 6
    Ib. 160
  • 1
    State v. Atchison, etc. R., 24 Neb. 143 (1888).
  • 2
    Eel River R. v. State, 57 N. E. 388 (1900), Ind.
  • 3
    4 Wash. 644.
  • 4
    145 U. S. 393.
  • 5
    171 U. S. 138.
  • 6
    McCutcheon v. Merz Capsule Co., 37 U. S. App. 586 (1896).
  • 1
    145 U. S. 393.
  • 2
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Railroad Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445, 450 (1873)
    • 7Am. & Eng. Encyc. of Law (2d ed.), 747.
  • 3
    McCluer v. Manchester, etc. R., 13 Gray, 124 (1859).
  • 4
    9 Hare, 306 (1851).