Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Lord Westbury

Van Vechten Veeder
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 13, No. 7 (Mar., 1900), pp. 557-569
DOI: 10.2307/1323813
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1323813
Page Count: 13
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 20 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 2
    3 New Repts. 494.
  • 2
    This reference contains 10 citations:
    • Peck v . North Staffordshire Ry., io H. L. 565
    • O'Brien v. Lewis, 32 L. J. Ch. 569
    • English Credit Co. v. Arduin, 5 E. & I. App. 76
    • Daniel v. Metropolitan Ry., 5 E. & I. App. 59
    • Barber v. Myerstein, 4 E. & I. App. 335
    • Shepherd v. Harrison, 5 E. & I. App. 128
    • Dixon v. Evans, 5 E. & I. App. 612
    • Mersey Docks v. Gibbs, i E. & I. App. 126
    • City of Glasgow Ry. v. Hunter, 2 Scotch & Div. App. 85
    • Isenburg v. East Indian Estates, 33 L. J. Ch. 392.
  • 1
    Scott v. Bennett, 5 E. & I. App. 251.
  • 2
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Attorney-General v. Campbell, S E. & I. App. 529.
    • Rose v. Watson, lO IS. L. 677.
  • 3
    32 L. J. Ch. 427.
  • 1
    This reference contains 14 citations:
    • Ex parte Harding, 33 L. J. Bank. 26
    • Spirett v. Willows, 34 L. J. Ch. 365
    • Weston v. Collins, 34 L. J. Cli. 353
    • Bickett v. Morris, I Scotch & Div. App. 60
    • New Brunswick Ry. v. Covnbeare. 9 H. L. 722
    • Tyrrell v Bank of London, 10 H. L 38
    • Taafe v. Conmee, io H. L. 74
    • Beative v. Hodgson, io H. L. 663
    • Rose v. Watson, IO Io. I. 677
    • Parker v. Tootal, ii H. L. 154
    • Cullen v. Atty.-Gen. i E. & I. App. 198
    • Williams zt. Bayley, i E. & I. App. 216
    • Atty.-Gen. v. Campbell, 5 E. & I. App. 529
    • Knox a. Gye, S E. & I. App. 670.
  • 1
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Gaun v. Free Fishers of Whitstable, It H. L. 192
    • Ricket v. Metropolitan Ry., L. R. 2 H. L. 175
    • Glasgow Ry. v. Hunter, L. R. 2 H. L. Sc. 78
    • Duke of Buccleuch v. Metropolitan Bd. of Works, 5 E & I. App. 461.
  • 2
    5 E. & I. App. 495
  • 3
    4 E. & I. App. 1.
  • 1
    1 E. & I. App. 188.
  • 2
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Udny v. Udny, I Scotch & Div. App. 457
    • Cookney v. Anderson, 32 L. J. Ch. 427
    • Ex parte Chavasse, 34 L. J. Bank. 17
    • Enohin v. Wylie, io H. L. 1
    • Bell v. Kennedy, I Scotch & Div. App. 320
    • Shaw v. Gould, 3 E. & I. App. 80.
  • 1
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Leather Cloth Co. v. Leather Cloth Co., 33 L. J. Ch. 199
    • McAndrew v. Bassett, 33 L. J. Ch. 561
    • Witherspoon v. Currie, 5 E. & I. App. 521
    • Hills v. Evans, 31 L. J. Ch. 458
    • Betts v. Menzies, io H. L. II
    • Horwood v. Great Northern Ry., 11 H. L. 676.
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Tapling v. Jones, i i H. L. 303
    • Suffield v. Bro.wn, 33 L. J. Ch. 249
    • Backhouse. v. Bonorni, 9 H. L. 503.
  • 3
    10 H. L. 208.
  • 4
    11 H. I. 649.
  • 5
    Ib. 630.
  • 6
    34 L. J. Ch. 203.
  • 7
    33 L. J. Ch. 392.
  • 8
    5 E. & I. App. 538.
  • 9
    Ib 565-