The Latest Phase of Negro Disfranchisement

Julien C. Monnet
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 26, No. 1 (Nov., 1912), pp. 42-63
DOI: 10.2307/1324271
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1324271
Page Count: 22
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The Latest Phase of Negro Disfranchisement
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 53 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Sproule v. Fredericks, 69 Miss. 898 (1892)
    • Dixon v. State, 74 Miss. 271 (1896).
  • 2
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Mississippi Constitution, Article 12, secs. 241-245 (1890)
    • South Carolina Constitution, Article 2, sec. 4 (1895)
    • Louisiana Con- stitution, Article 197, secs. 1-5 (1898)
    • North Carolina Constitution, Article 6, secs. 1-4 (1900)
    • Alabama Constitution, Article 8, secs. 180-187 (1901)
    • Virginia Consti- tution, Article 2, secs. 18-23 (1902)
    • Georgia Constitution, Article 2, sec. 1 (1908)
    • Acts of Maryland, 1908, c. 525
  • 3
    Williams, Annotated Constitution and Enabling Act of Oklahoma, p. 25
  • 4
    Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. (U. S.) 162 (1874).
  • 5
    33 Congressional Record, 1162
  • 6
    United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 (1875).
  • 7
    United States v. Reese, 92 U. S. 214 (1875).
  • 8
    16 U. S. Stat. at Large, 140
  • 9
    Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370 (1880)
  • 10
    Yarbrough, 110 U. S. 651 (1884).
  • 11
    John Mabry Matthews, p. 109
  • 12
    Wiley v. Sinkler, 179 U. S. 58 (1900).
  • 13
    Siebold, 100 U. S. 371 (1879).
  • 14
    United States v. Amsden, 6 Fed. 819 (1881).
  • 15
    Lackey v. United States, 107 Fed. 114 (C. C. A. 1901).
  • 16
    James v. Bowman, 190 U. S. 127 (1903).
  • 17
    Mathews, Fifteenth Amendment, supra, p. 117
  • 18
    Karem v. United States, 121 Fed. 250 (C. C. A. 1903).
  • 19
    Mathews, Fifteenth Amendment, supra, p. 112
  • 20
    Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U. S. 270 (1884).
  • 21
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. S. 313 (1879)
    • Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194 (1886)
    • Scott v. McNeal, 154 U. S. 34 (1894)
    • Virginia, 100 U. S. 339 (1879)
    • Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226 (1897).
  • 22
    Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U. S. 1 (1890).
  • 23
    McKay v. Campbell, 1 Saw. 374 (1870).
  • 24
    Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fé R. Co. v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96 (1899).
  • 25
    Cooley, Constitutional Law (6 ed.), 758.
  • 26
    Lyman v. Martin, 2 Utah (Ter.) 136.
  • 27
    Monroe v. Collins, 17 Oh. St. 665 (1867).
  • 28
    Capen v. Foster, 12 Pick. (Mass.) 485 (1832).
  • 29
    Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356 (1886).
  • 30
    Pope v. Williams, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).
  • 31
    Atwater v. Hassett, 27 Okla. 292 (1910).
  • 32
    1 Willoughby on the Constitution, § 238
  • 33
    27 Okla. 292 1910)
  • 34
    infra
  • 35
    Mills v. Green, 67 Fed. 818 (1895).
  • 36
    Green v. Mills, 69 Fed. 852 (1895).
  • 37
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651 (1895).
    • Mathews, Fifteenth Amendment, supra, p. 141
  • 38
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Giles v. Harris, 189 U. S. 475 (1903).
    • Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146 (1904).
  • 39
    17 HARV. L. REV. 130.
  • 40
    Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147 (1904).
  • 41
    Williams v. Mississippi, 170 U. S. 213 (1898).
  • 42
    Amasa M. Eaton, 13 HARV. L. REV. 279.
  • 44
    27 Okla. 292 (1910).
  • 45
    33 Congressional Record, 1027
  • 46
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Anderson v. Myers, 182 Fed. 223 (C. C., Dist. Maryland, 1910).
    • Clark v. Statesville, 139 N. C. 490 (1905)
    • Shaw, 4 Okla. Cr. 416 (1910).
  • 47
    ACTS, MD., 1908, C. 525
  • 48
    American Political Science Review, Vol. 1, p. 20
  • 49
    McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1 (1892).
  • 50
    American Political Science Review, Vol. I, p. 34.
  • 51
    U. S. Comp. Stat., 1901, P. 506
  • 52
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Arthur W. Machen, Jr., in an article in 23 HARV. L. REV. 169
    • William C. Coleman in 10Col. L. Rev. 416.
  • 53
    24 HARV. L. REV. 388
  • 33 Congressional Record, 671 et seq