Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The Latest Phase of Negro Disfranchisement

Julien C. Monnet
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 26, No. 1 (Nov., 1912), pp. 42-63
DOI: 10.2307/1324271
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1324271
Page Count: 22
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
The Latest Phase of Negro Disfranchisement
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 53 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Sproule v. Fredericks, 69 Miss. 898 (1892)
    • Dixon v. State, 74 Miss. 271 (1896).
  • 2
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Mississippi Constitution, Article 12, secs. 241-245 (1890)
    • South Carolina Constitution, Article 2, sec. 4 (1895)
    • Louisiana Con- stitution, Article 197, secs. 1-5 (1898)
    • North Carolina Constitution, Article 6, secs. 1-4 (1900)
    • Alabama Constitution, Article 8, secs. 180-187 (1901)
    • Virginia Consti- tution, Article 2, secs. 18-23 (1902)
    • Georgia Constitution, Article 2, sec. 1 (1908)
    • Acts of Maryland, 1908, c. 525
  • 3
    Williams, Annotated Constitution and Enabling Act of Oklahoma, p. 25
  • 4
    Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. (U. S.) 162 (1874).
  • 5
    33 Congressional Record, 1162
  • 6
    United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 (1875).
  • 7
    United States v. Reese, 92 U. S. 214 (1875).
  • 8
    16 U. S. Stat. at Large, 140
  • 9
    Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370 (1880)
  • 10
    Yarbrough, 110 U. S. 651 (1884).
  • 11
    John Mabry Matthews, p. 109
  • 12
    Wiley v. Sinkler, 179 U. S. 58 (1900).
  • 13
    Siebold, 100 U. S. 371 (1879).
  • 14
    United States v. Amsden, 6 Fed. 819 (1881).
  • 15
    Lackey v. United States, 107 Fed. 114 (C. C. A. 1901).
  • 16
    James v. Bowman, 190 U. S. 127 (1903).
  • 17
    Mathews, Fifteenth Amendment, supra, p. 117
  • 18
    Karem v. United States, 121 Fed. 250 (C. C. A. 1903).
  • 19
    Mathews, Fifteenth Amendment, supra, p. 112
  • 20
    Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U. S. 270 (1884).
  • 21
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. S. 313 (1879)
    • Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194 (1886)
    • Scott v. McNeal, 154 U. S. 34 (1894)
    • Virginia, 100 U. S. 339 (1879)
    • Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226 (1897).
  • 22
    Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U. S. 1 (1890).
  • 23
    McKay v. Campbell, 1 Saw. 374 (1870).
  • 24
    Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fé R. Co. v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96 (1899).
  • 25
    Cooley, Constitutional Law (6 ed.), 758.
  • 26
    Lyman v. Martin, 2 Utah (Ter.) 136.
  • 27
    Monroe v. Collins, 17 Oh. St. 665 (1867).
  • 28
    Capen v. Foster, 12 Pick. (Mass.) 485 (1832).
  • 29
    Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356 (1886).
  • 30
    Pope v. Williams, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).
  • 31
    Atwater v. Hassett, 27 Okla. 292 (1910).
  • 32
    1 Willoughby on the Constitution, § 238
  • 33
    27 Okla. 292 1910)
  • 34
    infra
  • 35
    Mills v. Green, 67 Fed. 818 (1895).
  • 36
    Green v. Mills, 69 Fed. 852 (1895).
  • 37
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651 (1895).
    • Mathews, Fifteenth Amendment, supra, p. 141
  • 38
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Giles v. Harris, 189 U. S. 475 (1903).
    • Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146 (1904).
  • 39
    17 HARV. L. REV. 130.
  • 40
    Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147 (1904).
  • 41
    Williams v. Mississippi, 170 U. S. 213 (1898).
  • 42
    Amasa M. Eaton, 13 HARV. L. REV. 279.
  • 44
    27 Okla. 292 (1910).
  • 45
    33 Congressional Record, 1027
  • 46
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Anderson v. Myers, 182 Fed. 223 (C. C., Dist. Maryland, 1910).
    • Clark v. Statesville, 139 N. C. 490 (1905)
    • Shaw, 4 Okla. Cr. 416 (1910).
  • 47
    ACTS, MD., 1908, C. 525
  • 48
    American Political Science Review, Vol. 1, p. 20
  • 49
    McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1 (1892).
  • 50
    American Political Science Review, Vol. I, p. 34.
  • 51
    U. S. Comp. Stat., 1901, P. 506
  • 52
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Arthur W. Machen, Jr., in an article in 23 HARV. L. REV. 169
    • William C. Coleman in 10Col. L. Rev. 416.
  • 53
    24 HARV. L. REV. 388
  • 33 Congressional Record, 671 et seq