Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The Legality of Contracts of Sale Which Prohibit the Purchaser-Retailer from Handling Goods of the Wholesaler's Competitors

Harvard Law Review
Vol. 30, No. 1 (Nov., 1916), pp. 72-75
DOI: 10.2307/1327293
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1327293
Page Count: 4
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Page Thumbnails

Notes and References

This item contains 14 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    MATTHEWS AND ADLER, RESTRAINT OF TRADE, 2 ed., 38, 39.
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Nordenfelt v. Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co., [1894] A. C. 535.
    • MATTHEWS AND ADLER, supra
    • B. A. Ross, " Freedom of Trade," 5COMMONW. L. REV.241.
  • 3
    Augustine L. Humes, "The Power of Congress over Combinations," 17HARV. L. REV.83, 87.
  • 4
    Roland R. Foulke, "Restraints on Trade," 12COL. L. REV.87, 132.
  • 5
    30 HARV. L. REV.68.
  • 6
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Brown v. Rounsavell, 78 Ill. 589 (1875)
    • Peerless Pattern Co. v. Gauntlett Dry Goods Co., 171 Mich. 158, 136 N. W. 1113 (1912)
    • J. W. Ripy & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mills, 41 Okl. 20, 136 Pac. 1080 (1913)
    • Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Travi, 179 Ill. App. 269 (1913)
    • Purington v. Hinchcliff, 219 Ill. 159, 76 N. E. 47 (1905)
  • 7
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Osborne, 158 N. W. 566, 568 (Ia.) (1916)
    • Pictorial Review Co. v. New Model Dry Goods Co., 185 S. W. 1199 (Mo. App.) (1916)
    • Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Voigt & Sons Co., 212 U. S. 227 (1909)
  • 9
    This reference contains 17 citations:
    • REV. L. MASS., 1902, c. 56, § 1
    • Butterick Pub. Co. v. Fisher, 203 Mass. 122, 89 N. E. 189 (1909)
    • N. C. PUB. LAWS, 1911, c. 167, § 1
    • Standard Fashion Co. v. Grant, 165 N. C. 453, 81 S. E. 606 (1914)
    • LAWS OF 1909, c. 224
    • Sul- livan v. Rime, 35 S. D. 75, 150 N. W. 556 (1915)
    • STAT. WIS., § 1747 e
    • Sullivan v. Rose, 158 Wis. 414, 149 N. W. 158 (1914)
    • 7796, 7798, and 7807 of TEX. CIV. STAT
    • Simmons v. Terry, 79 S. W. 1103 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1904)
    • Segal v. McCall Co., 184 S. W. 188 (Tex.) (1916)
    • W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 184 S. W. 549 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1916)
    • Pictorial Review Co. v. Pate Bros., 185 S. W. 309 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1916)
    • T. W. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Gunn, 186 S. W. 385 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1916)
    • Wood v. Texas Ice and Cold Storage Co., 171 S. W. 497 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1914)
    • Carrol v. Evansville Brewing Ass'n, 179 S. W. 1099 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1915)
    • Celli v. Galveston Brewing Co., 186 S. W. 278 (Tex. Civ. App.) (1916)
  • 11
    38 STAT. 730
  • 12
    United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co., 234 Fed. 127 (1916).
  • 13
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Segal v. McCall Co., supra
    • Peerless Pattern Co. v. Gauntlett Dry Goods Co., and J. W. Ripy & Sons v. Art Wall Paper Mills, supra
    • J. B. Watkins Medical Co. v. Holloway, 182 Mo. App. 140, 168 S. W. 290
    • Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 204.
  • 14
    Cole Motor Car Co. z. Hurst, 228 Fed. 280 (1915)
  • 15
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • J. W. Ripy & Sons Co. v. Art Wall Paper Mills
    • Sullivan v. Rose, supra.
  • 18
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Henry R. Seager, "The New Anti-trust Acts," 30POL. SCI. Q.448
    • M. S. Hot- tesheim, "The Sherman Anti-trust Law," 44AM. L. REV.827, 852.
    • B. A. Ross, "Freedom of Trade." supra. at 240.