Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Effect in Equity of a Conditional Contract to Mortgage

Harvard Law Review
Vol. 33, No. 3 (Jan., 1920), pp. 456-458
DOI: 10.2307/1327485
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1327485
Page Count: 3
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Page Thumbnails

Notes and References

This item contains 9 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 107 Atl. 646
    • RECENT CASES, p. 476, infra.
  • 2
    This reference contains 10 citations:
    • Holroyd v. Marshall, 10 H. L. C. 191 (1862)
    • Wickes v. Hynson, 95 Md. 511, 52 Atl. 747 (1902)
    • Atlantic Trust Co. v. Holdsworth, 50 App. Div. (N. Y.) 623, 63 N. Y. Supp. 756 (1900)
    • Carter v. Sapulpa & Interurban Ry., 49 Okla. 471, 153 Pac. 853 (1915)
    • Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 97 Kan. 408, 155 Pac. 791 (1916)
    • accord. Chase v. Denny, 130 Mass. 566 (1880)
    • Samuel Williston, "Transfers of Personal Property," 19HARV. L. REV.560, note 4.
    • 3POMEROY, EQ. JUR., 4 ed., § 1235
    • Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654, 664 (1897)
    • Knott v. Mfg. Co., 30 W. Va. 790, 795, 5 S. E. 266, 268 (1888).
  • 3
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Ames, Cas. Eq. Jur. p. 61, note 3
    • King v. Williams, 66 Ark. 333, 50 S. W. 695 (1899)
    • Hamilton v. Hamil- ton, 162 Ind. 430, 70 N. E. 535 (1904).
    • FRY, SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, 3d ed., p. 23.
  • 4
    Holroyd v. Marshall, supra.
  • 5
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Stembridge v. Stembridge, 87 Ky. 91, 7 S. W. 611 (1888)
    • Sweezy v. Jones, 65 Iowa, 272, 21 N. W. 603 (1884).
    • Smith v. Loewenstein, 50 Ohio St. 346, 34 N. E. 159 (1893)
    • Rockland Co. v. Leary, 203 N. Y. 469, 97 N. E. 43 (1911)
    • Lawes v. Bennet, 1 Cox Ch. 167 (1805)
  • 6
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Thomas v. Howell, L. R. 34 Ch. D. 166 (1886)
    • Lunsford v. Jarrett, 11 Lea (Tenn.), 192 (1883).
    • Cooper v. Jarman, 3 Eq. 98, 101 (1866).
  • 7
    Mackey v. Bowles, 98 Ga. 730, 25 S. E. 834 (1896).
  • 8
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Government Stock Co. v. Manila Ry. Co., [1897] A. C. 81, 86 (1896)
    • SIMONSON, DEBENTURES AND DEBENTURE STOCK, 15-26.
  • 9
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Ross v. Parks, 93 Ala. 153, 8 So. 368 (1890)
    • Calanchini v. Branstetter, 84 Cal. 249, 24 Pac. 149 (1890)
    • Horgan v. Russell, 24 N. D. 490, 140 N. W. 99 (1913)
    • Faraday Coal & Coke Co. v. Owens, 26 Ky. L. Rep. 243, 80 S. W. 1171 (1904)
    • Sizer v. Clark, 116 WiS. 534, 93 N. W. 539 (1903)
    • City of Birmingham v. Forney, 173 Ala. 1, 55 So. 618 (1911).
    • "Specific Performance for and against Strangers to the Contract," 17HARV. L. REV.174.