Some Problems in Specific Performance

George L. Clark
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 31, No. 2 (Dec., 1917), pp. 271-287
DOI: 10.2307/1327530
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1327530
Page Count: 17
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Some Problems in Specific Performance
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 31 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 3
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Porter v. Frenchman's Bay & Mt. Desert Land & Water Co., 84 Me. 195 (1892)
    • 36 Cyc. 566, note 53.
  • 4
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Adams v. Messinger, I47 Mass. 185 (1888)
    • Adderley v. Dixon, i Simons & Stuart 607 (1824)
    • Cheale v. Kenward, 3 De Gex & J. 27 (1858).
    • Kenney v. Wexham, 6 Maddock, 355 (1822)
  • 6
    Pooley v. Budd, 14 Beav. 34, 44 (1851).
  • 7
    "The Decadence of Equity," by ROSCOE POUND, 5COL. LAW REV.20.
  • 8
    Lewis v. Lechmere, 10 Modern, 503 (1721).
  • 9
    JAMES BARR AMES, "Mutuality in Specific Performance," 3COL. LAW REV. 1, 12.
  • 10
    WILLISTON ON SALES, § 562.
  • 11
    Prof. WALTER WHEELER COOK in 6AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE, 183
  • 15
    115 Mass. 244 (1874).
  • 16
    Nichols v. Jones, I9 Fed. 855 (1884)
  • 21
    WILLISTON ON SALES, § 144.
  • 22
    48 Fla. 268 (1904).
  • 23
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • WILLISTON ON SALES, §§ 143 and 144
    • 18HARV. L. REV.454
    • 1COL. LAW REV.267.
  • 24
    Mayor of Wolverhampton v. Emmons, [1901] 1 K. B. 515.
  • 25
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • VanSant v. Rose, 170 Ill. App. 572 (1912)
    • 260 Ill. 401
  • 27
    Flint v. Brandon, 8 Ves. I59 (1803).
  • 29
    I EQ. ABRIDGMENT, 274, placitum, II (1694).
  • 30
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 10COL. LAW. REV.574
    • 1 AMES EQ. CAS. 68, note 4.
  • 31
    L. R. 3 Eq. 98 (1866).
  • 32
    [1898] 2 Ch. 510
  • 37
    94 Mich. 502 (1883).
  • 38
    27 Ch. Div. 394 (1883).
  • 40
    106 U. S. 252 (1882).
  • 41
    11 R. I. 390, 393 (1826).
  • 43
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Green v. Smith, I Atk. 572 (1738)
    • Broome v. Monck, I0 Ves. 597, 612 (1805).
  • 44
    Watts v. Kellar, 56 Fed. i (1893).
  • 47
    "A Brief Survey of Equity Jurisdiction," 1HARV. L. REV.355, 374.
  • 51
    Tulkv. Moxhay, 2 Phillips, 774 (1848)
  • 52
    Paine v. Mleller 6 Ves. 349 (1801).
  • 54
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Carrodus v. Sharp, 20 Beav., 56 (1855)
    • Liggett v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., L. R. 5 Ch. App. 7I6 (1870)
  • 56
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Paine v. Meller
    • ante, 52.