Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Some Problems in Specific Performance

George L. Clark
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 31, No. 2 (Dec., 1917), pp. 271-287
DOI: 10.2307/1327530
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1327530
Page Count: 17
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Some Problems in Specific Performance
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 31 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 3
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Porter v. Frenchman's Bay & Mt. Desert Land & Water Co., 84 Me. 195 (1892)
    • 36 Cyc. 566, note 53.
  • 4
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Adams v. Messinger, I47 Mass. 185 (1888)
    • Adderley v. Dixon, i Simons & Stuart 607 (1824)
    • Cheale v. Kenward, 3 De Gex & J. 27 (1858).
    • Kenney v. Wexham, 6 Maddock, 355 (1822)
  • 6
    Pooley v. Budd, 14 Beav. 34, 44 (1851).
  • 7
    "The Decadence of Equity," by ROSCOE POUND, 5COL. LAW REV.20.
  • 8
    Lewis v. Lechmere, 10 Modern, 503 (1721).
  • 9
    JAMES BARR AMES, "Mutuality in Specific Performance," 3COL. LAW REV. 1, 12.
  • 10
    WILLISTON ON SALES, § 562.
  • 11
    Prof. WALTER WHEELER COOK in 6AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE, 183
  • 15
    115 Mass. 244 (1874).
  • 16
    Nichols v. Jones, I9 Fed. 855 (1884)
  • 21
    WILLISTON ON SALES, § 144.
  • 22
    48 Fla. 268 (1904).
  • 23
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • WILLISTON ON SALES, §§ 143 and 144
    • 18HARV. L. REV.454
    • 1COL. LAW REV.267.
  • 24
    Mayor of Wolverhampton v. Emmons, [1901] 1 K. B. 515.
  • 25
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • VanSant v. Rose, 170 Ill. App. 572 (1912)
    • 260 Ill. 401
  • 27
    Flint v. Brandon, 8 Ves. I59 (1803).
  • 29
    I EQ. ABRIDGMENT, 274, placitum, II (1694).
  • 30
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 10COL. LAW. REV.574
    • 1 AMES EQ. CAS. 68, note 4.
  • 31
    L. R. 3 Eq. 98 (1866).
  • 32
    [1898] 2 Ch. 510
  • 37
    94 Mich. 502 (1883).
  • 38
    27 Ch. Div. 394 (1883).
  • 40
    106 U. S. 252 (1882).
  • 41
    11 R. I. 390, 393 (1826).
  • 43
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Green v. Smith, I Atk. 572 (1738)
    • Broome v. Monck, I0 Ves. 597, 612 (1805).
  • 44
    Watts v. Kellar, 56 Fed. i (1893).
  • 47
    "A Brief Survey of Equity Jurisdiction," 1HARV. L. REV.355, 374.
  • 51
    Tulkv. Moxhay, 2 Phillips, 774 (1848)
  • 52
    Paine v. Mleller 6 Ves. 349 (1801).
  • 54
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Carrodus v. Sharp, 20 Beav., 56 (1855)
    • Liggett v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., L. R. 5 Ch. App. 7I6 (1870)
  • 56
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Paine v. Meller
    • ante, 52.