Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Jurisdiction to Confiscate Debts

Harvard Law Review
Vol. 35, No. 8 (Jun., 1922), pp. 960-964
DOI: 10.2307/1329017
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1329017
Page Count: 5
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 21 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 9 citations:
    • Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch (U. S.) 110, 122 (1814)
    • Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. (U. S.) 268 (1870)
    • 1 HALLECK, INT. LAW, 3 ed., 532, 533.
    • Central Union Trust Co. v. Garvan, 254 U. S. 554 (1920).
    • G. G. Phillimore, "Booty of War," 3 J. COMP. LEG. 214, 219, 227
    • 28YALE L. J.478.
    • United States v. Percheman, 7 Pet. (U. S.) 51, 86 (1833)
    • McMullen v. Hodge, 5 Tex. 34 (1849).
    • Berkeley Davis, "Confiscation of Property in Warfare," 19LAW NOTES (N. Y.) 85, 86.
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. (U. S.) 199, 226-231, 263-266 (1796)
    • Fritz Schultz, Jr., Co. v. Raimes & Co., 99 Misc. 626, 164 N. Y. Supp. 454 (1917)
    • aff'd 100 Misc. 697, 166 N. Y. Supp. 567 (1917).
  • 3
    This reference contains 11 citations:
    • Brown v. United States, supra, at 123
    • United States v. Klein, 13 Wall. (U. S.) 128, 137 (1871)
    • Lamar v. Browne, 92 U.S. 187, 194 (1875)
    • Stohr v. Wallace, 269 Fed. 827, 839 (S. D. N. Y., 1920)
    • United States v. Capital Stock, 5 Blatch. 231 (Circ. Ct., S. D. N. Y., 1865).
    • 1 HALLECK, INT. LAW, 3 ed., 533-538
    • 28YALE L. J.478
    • HAGUE CONVENTION (1907)
    • LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR ON LAND, Art. 46, 36 STAT. AT L. 2306
    • Art. 53, 36 STAT. AT L. 2308
    • Berkeley Davis, supra.
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Brown v. United States, supra
    • Miller v. United States, supra.
  • 5
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Camp v. Lockwood, 1 Dall. (Pa.) 393 (1788).
    • 7 MOORE, DIG. INT. LAW, 310.
  • 6
    This reference contains 11 citations:
    • Acts of Aug. 6, 1861, and July 17, 1862, 12 STAT. AT L. 319, 589.
    • The Confiscation Cases, 20 Wall. (U. S.) 92, 94 (1873).
    • Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. (U. S.) 268. (1870)
    • United States v. Capital Stock, supra
    • Phoenix Bank v. Risley, 111 U. S. 125 (1884)
    • Risley v. Phenix Bank, 83 N. Y. 318 (1881)
    • Chapman v. Phoenix Bank, 85 N. Y. 437 (1881).
    • 7 MOORE, op. cit., 294
    • 28YALE L. J.478, 481.
    • Semmes v. United States, 91 U. S. 21 (1875).
    • Miller v. United States, supra.
  • 7
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • 40 STAT AT L. 411
    • 40 STAT AT L. 459, 460, 1020
    • 41 id. 35, 977.
  • 8
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Central Union Trust Co. v. Garvan, supra
    • Fischer v. Palmer, 259 Fed. 355 (M. D. Pa., 1919).
    • Streb v. Chatham & Phenix Nat. Bank, 108 Misc. 368, 178 N. Y. Supp. 309 (1919).
    • Kohn v. Kohn, 264 Fed. 253 (S. D. N. Y., 1920)
    • Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U. S. 239 (1921)
    • Salamandra Ins. Co. v. N. Y. Life Ins. and Trust Co., 254 Fed. 852 (S. D. N. Y., 1918)
    • 28 YALE L. J.499.
    • Am. Exchange Nat. Bank v. Palmer, 256 Fed. 680 (S. D. N. Y., 1919).
  • 9
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • A. Mitchell Palmer, "The Great Work of the Alien Property Custodian," 53AM. L. REV. 43, 51 et seq.
    • A. Mitchell Palmer, "Enemy Property in America," 1919 PA B. A., 259, 275.
    • A. W. Lafferty, "Should America Return Private German Property?" 15ILL. L. REV. 79
    • 28YALE L. J.478.
  • 10
    Nelligan v. Citizens' Bank of Louisiana, 21 La. Ann. 332 (1869)
  • 11
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Miller v. United States, supra
    • Alexandria v. Fairfax, 95 U. S. 774 (1877)
    • Phoe- nix Bank v. Risley, supra
  • 12
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Chicago, Rock Id., & Pacific R. R. v. Sturm, 174 U. S. 710 (1899)
    • Harris v. Balk, 198 U. S. 215 (1905).
    • Miller v. United States, supra, at 297
    • Joseph H. Beale. "Jurisdiction In Rem to Compel Payment of a Debt," 27HARV. L. REV. 107, 111.
  • 13
    Joseph H. Beale, supra, at 116.
  • 14
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Thomas Baty, "So Called 'De Facto' Recognition," 31YALE L. J.469, 484.
    • 1 MOORE, op. cit., 49
    • United States v. Rice, 4 Wheat. (U. S.) 246 (1819)
    • Ford v. Surget, 97 U. S. 594 (1878)
    • Thorington v. Smith, 8 Wall. (U. S.) 1, 8 (1868)
    • Mauran v. Ins. Co., 6 Wall. (U. S.) 1 (1867).
    • 1 MOORE, op. cit., 43, 44
    • note 17, infra.
  • 15
    35HARV. L. REV. 607.
  • 16
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U. S. 250 (1897)
    • Oetjen v. Central Leather Co., 246 U. S. 297 (1918)
    • Terrazas v. Holmes, 225 S. W. 848 (Tex., 1920).
    • Williams v. Bruffy, 96 U. S. 176, 185 (1877).
    • 18MICH. L. REV. 531.
  • 17
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • United States v. Sutter, 21 How. (U. S.) 170 (1858)
    • United States v. Rose, 23 How. (U. S.) 262 (1859)
    • Texas v. White, 7 Wall. (U. S.) 700 (1868)
    • Williams v. Bruffy, 96 U. S. 176 (1877)
    • Dewing v. Perdicaries, 96 U. S. 193 (1877).
    • 18MICH. L. REV. 531.
  • 18
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Williams v. Bruffy, supra
    • Stevens v. Griffith, 111 U. S. 48 (1884)
    • Keppel v. Petersburg R. R. Co., Fed. Cas. No. 7722 (Circ. Ct., D. Va., 1868)
    • Vance v. Burtis, 39 Tex. 88 (1873).
  • 19
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • 18MICH. L. REV. 531.
    • 35HARV. L. REV. 607.
    • Thomas Baty, supra, at 472.
  • 20
    Russek v. Angulo, 236 S. W. 131 (Tex., 1922).
  • 21
    Note 12, supra.