Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Liability for Attack by Mad Dog Known to Be Vicious

Harvard Law Review
Vol. 34, No. 7 (May, 1921), pp. 770-773
DOI: 10.2307/1329230
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1329230
Page Count: 4
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 15 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Mason v. Keeling, 12 Mod. 332 (1699)
    • O'Connel v. Jarvis, I3 App. Div. 3, 43 N. Y. Supp. 129 (1897)
    • Domm v. Holenbeck, 259 Ill. 382, 102 N. E. 782 (1913).
  • 2
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Quilty v. Battie, 155 N. Y. 201, 204, 32 N. E. 47, 49 (1892)
    • Speckmann v. Kreig, 79 Mo. App. 376, 381 (1899).
  • 3
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Cox v. Burbidge, 13 C. B. (N. s.) 430 (1863)
    • Klenberg v. Russel, 125 Ind. 531, 25 N. E. 596 (1890).
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Keightlinger v. Egan, 65 Ill. 235 (1872)
    • Osborne v. Chocqueel, [1896] 2 Q. B. 109.
  • 5
    Merritt v. Matchett, 135 Mo. App. 176, 178, 115 S. W. 1066, 1068 (1909)
  • 6
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Clinkenbeard v. Reinert, 225 S. W. (Mo.) 667.
    • RECENT CASES, p. 783, infra.
  • 7
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Armstrong v. Montgomery St. Ry. 123 Ala. 233, 26 So. 349 (1899)
    • Day v. Gr. East. Cas. Co., 104 Wash. 575, 177 Pac. 650 (1919).
    • J. H. Beale, "The Proxi- mate Consequences of an Act," 33HARV. L. REV. 633, 645.
  • 8
    14ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, 11 ed., 168.
  • 9
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • note 3, supra
    • E. R. Thayer, "Public Wrong and Private Action," 27HARV. L. REV. 317, 328.
    • Marsh v. Koons, 78 Oh. St. 86, 84 N. E. 599 (1908)
    • Heath's Garage (Ltd.) v. Hodges, 32 T. L. R. 134 (1915)
    • Bowen v. Lightfoot, 52 Dom. L. R. 305 (1920).
  • 10
    Hadwell v. Righton, [1907] 2 K. B. 345
  • 11
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Gething v. Morgan, 29 L. T. R. 106 (1857).
    • 2COOLEY, TORTS, 3 ed., 697.
  • 12
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Worthen v. Love, 60 Vt. 285, 14 Atl. 461 (1888)
    • Hayes v. Smith, 62 Oh. St. 161, 56 N. E. 879 (1900)
    • De Gray v. Murray, 69 N. J. L. 458, 55 Atl. 237 (1903).
  • 13
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Worth v. Gilling, L. R. 2 C. P. 1 (1866)
    • Read v. Edwards, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 245 (1864)
    • Osborne v. Chocqueel, [1896] 2 Q. B. 109, 111.
    • Hartley v. Harriman, 1 B. & Ald. 620 (1818).
  • 14
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • State v. McDermott, 49 N. J. L. 163, 6 Atl. 653 (1886)
    • Oakes v. Spaulding, 40 Vt. 347 (1867).
  • 15
    Duval v. Barnaby, 75 App. Div. 154, 77 N. Y. SuPP. 337, 338 (1902).