Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Constitutional Law. Double Jeopardy and Ex Post Facto Clauses. Third Circuit Holds That Notification Requirement of Megan's Law Does Not Constitute Punishment. E. B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir. 1997)

Harvard Law Review
Vol. 111, No. 5 (Mar., 1998), pp. 1353-1358
DOI: 10.2307/1342168
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342168
Page Count: 6
  • Get Access
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Constitutional Law. Double Jeopardy and Ex Post Facto Clauses. Third Circuit Holds That Notification Requirement of Megan's Law Does Not Constitute Punishment. E. B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir. 1997)
Preview not available

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1353
    1353
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1354
    1354
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1355
    1355
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1356
    1356
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1357
    1357
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1358
    1358