You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Is the Area of Apum-Damascus Mentioned in the Mari Archives?
Wayne T. Pitard
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
No. 264 (Nov., 1986), pp. 73-77
Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1357021
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Archives, Writing tablets, Towns, Cuneiform, Kanis, Names, Land economics, Reference letters, Geography, Cities
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In 1939 Dossin published a list of several kings and states mentioned in the Mari letters as having economic dealings with Mari. Among the kings in the list were two rulers of a land of Apum. While Dossin assumed that these kings lived in the land of Apum located in northern Mesopotamia, W. F. Albright in 1941 proposed that they were rulers of the land of Apum in southern Syria, around the area of Damascus. Albright's proposal has been widely accepted among biblical scholars and historical geographers. However, recently-published Mari letters indicate that the kings listed by Dossin belong to the Mesopotamian Apum rather than the Damascene one. There are, in fact, no known references to the Damascene Apum in the Mari letters.
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research © 1986 The American Schools of Oriental Research