You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Effects of Urbanization on Avian Community Organization
Steven R. Beissinger and David R. Osborne
Vol. 84, No. 1 (Feb., 1982), pp. 75-83
Published by: American Ornithological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1367825
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Birds, Aviculture, Forest habitats, Urban habitats, Forest canopy, Foraging, Biomass, Leaves, Species, Urban areas
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The avian community of a mature residential area was studied and compared with an undisturbed climax beech-maple forest. Urbanization was presumed to be responsible for decreasing species richness and diversity, increasing biomass and density, and favoring dominance by a few species. Foraging guilds shifted from forest insectivores that were canopy foliage gleaners or bark drillers to urban ground gleaners. Analyses of habitat structure showed that although urban foliage height diversity was like that of the forest, the urban area contained only one-third of the total percent vegetative cover. As compared to the forest, urban vegetative cover was: (1) significantly less in all but the middle layer; (2) replaced by man-made structures, ground cover and ornamental vegetation in the low and middle layers but dominated the high layer; and (3) highly discontinuous, existing as isolated strata. Differences in avian community organization between the forest and urban area are discussed in relation to urban habitat manipulation and population-suppressing factors.
The Condor © 1982 Cooper Ornithological Society