You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Dietary Overlap in Frugivorous and Insectivorous Bats from Edaphic Cerrado Habitats of Brazil
Michael R. Willig, Gerardo R. Camilo and Susan J. Noble
Journal of Mammalogy
Vol. 74, No. 1 (Feb., 1993), pp. 117-128
Published by: American Society of Mammalogists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1381910
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Previous studies on size patterns within frugivorous and insectivorous bat guilds from northeastern Brazil suggest significant ecological separation of species. Nonetheless, recent simulation studies indicate that stochastic processes alone, rather than competition or coevolution, account for the morphological structure of these communities. To evaluate the dietary consequences of observed morphological structure, monthly samples of bats were collected (September 1976-May 1978) within edaphic Cerrado habitats on the Chapada do Araripe in northeastern Brazil. For each of the 11 most common species, stomach contents were identified, and the diets characterized for wet and dry seasons. Nonparametric statistical analyses of dietary constituents revealed two non-overlapping groups of frugivores based upon a posteriori contrasts: those that specialize on one food source, Vismia sp. (Carollia perspicillata, Artibeus planirostris, A. lituratus), and those that are more generalistic in their feeding habits (Glossophaga soricina, Sturnira lilium, Vampyrops lineatus). Statistical analyses of insectivorous species produced a homogeneous group (Anoura geoffroyi, Phyllostomus discolor, P. hastatus, Molossus molossus) based on classification of diet into hard-bodied versus soft-bodied insects. Like the ecomorphological assessments of community structure, our results failed to detect pervasive dietary differences among species that are related to size considerations.
Journal of Mammalogy © 1993 American Society of Mammalogists