You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comparison of Traps and Baits for Censusing Small Mammals in Neotropical Lowlands
Neal Woodman, Robert M. Timm, Norman A. Slade and Terry J. Doonan
Journal of Mammalogy
Vol. 77, No. 1 (Feb., 1996), pp. 274-281
Published by: American Society of Mammalogists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1382728
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mammals, Species, Animal traps, Rainy seasons, Dry seasons, Mammalogy, Tropical rain forests, Animals, Lowlands, Suet
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Snap-traps, live-traps, and baits affect the ability to capture small mammals, but few previous studies have involved sampling communities of small mammals in tropical environments. We tested differences in captures of small marsupials and rodents by Victor snap-traps versus Sherman live-traps and by two types of bait in lowland rainforest at Reserva Cuzco Amazónico, southeastern Peru. Snap-traps took ca. 3.5 times as many individuals as live-traps. Snap-traps also captured more species (and more rare species), but we attribute this to more numerous captures overall because the relative proportions of species captured by the two traps generally were the same. Type of bait had little impact on our trapping results.
Journal of Mammalogy © 1996 American Society of Mammalogists