Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Microwear on Canines and Killing Behavior in Large Carnivores: Saber Function in Smilodon fatalis

William Anyonge
Journal of Mammalogy
Vol. 77, No. 4 (Nov., 1996), pp. 1059-1067
DOI: 10.2307/1382786
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1382786
Page Count: 9
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Microwear on Canines and Killing Behavior in Large Carnivores: Saber Function in Smilodon fatalis
Preview not available

Abstract

Canids and hyaenids display a high density of features of microwear on canine teeth that reflect their similarity in killing strategy. However, hyaenids tend to have a higher percentage of short and wide features (pits) because of the high percentage of bone in their diet. Canines of felids display relatively fewer features than canids and hyaenids, which suggest that felids apprehend prey by delivering deep, strong bites that result in less abrasion of the canines. I suggest that canids rely more heavily on their canines and incisors for feeding than do felids. Smilodon fatalis, a large saber-tooth cat from the Pleistocene of North America, is similar to living felids in having relatively few features of canines, but differs from cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and African lions (Panthera leo) in having relatively more pits. S. fatalis showed no consistent similarity in features of microwear on canine teeth to six large carnivores (leopard, Panthera pardus; cheetah; African lion; spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta; African wild dog, Lycaon pictus; gray wolf, Canis lupus), which suggests that its killing behavior and possibly dietary preference differed from modern predators. S. fatalis may have avoided contact with bone during killing and feeding encounters, which caused fewer features to form on the upper canines.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1059
    1059
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1060
    1060
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1061
    1061
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1062
    1062
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1063
    1063
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1064
    1064
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1065
    1065
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1066
    1066
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1067
    1067