You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Selection of Summer Roosting Sites by Indiana Bats (Myotis sodalis) in Missouri
Edward V. Callahan, Ronald D. Drobney and Richard L. Clawson
Journal of Mammalogy
Vol. 78, No. 3 (Aug., 1997), pp. 818-825
Published by: American Society of Mammalogists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1382939
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bats, Trees, Bark, Dead wood, Forest canopy, Precipitation, Tree trunks, Enterobacteriaceae, Sunlight, Summer
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Summer roosting sites were studied at four maternity colonies of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in northern Missouri. Colonies of Indiana bats used two types of roosts, primary and alternate, that differed in intensity of use, number, and probable function. Primary roosts were defined as roosts where use by >30 bats on more than one occasion was observed. The number of primary roosts per colony ranged from one to three. All primary roosts were in standing dead trees situated in trees exposed to direct sunlight. Alternate roosts were used by smaller numbers of bats. These roosts included both living and dead trees that typically were located within the shaded forest interior. Differences in patterns of use between types of roosts seemed to be influenced by weather conditions in that use of alternate roost trees increased during periods of elevated temperature and precipitation. Indiana bats have specific requirements for roost sites, but also must be able to relocate when loss of bark, tree fall, or other events render their current roost sites unusable. Practices of forest management within the summer range of Indiana bats should favor retention of large-diameter, mature, and senescent trees.
Journal of Mammalogy © 1997 American Society of Mammalogists