Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Morphometric Analysis of Seven Species of Pocket Gophers (Geomys)

Charlene L. Mauk, Marilyn A. Houck and Robert D. Bradley
Journal of Mammalogy
Vol. 80, No. 2 (May, 1999), pp. 499-511
DOI: 10.2307/1383296
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1383296
Page Count: 13
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Morphometric Analysis of Seven Species of Pocket Gophers (Geomys)
Preview not available

Abstract

Interspecific morphometric variation was assessed in seven species of pocket gophers (Geomys). One hundred and seven characters, representing cranial and post-cranial characters were examined in 131 individuals. A basic premise of this study was that previously under-represented appendicular, skeletal, and mandibular structures may provide informative data for species discrimination. Principal components analysis established that ca. 50% of among-group variation in males and females was attributable to size as determined by the magnitude, sign, and distribution of character loadings on the first principal component. Sexual dimorphism in these species primarily is a function of size, and shape differences are less important in the discrimination of gender. A phenogram of all species, constructed from the Mahalanobis distances, indicated that G. texensis and G. bursarius were most similar and G. breviceps and G. personatus were distinct compared with other species of Geomys. Other taxa were not discriminated completely in multivariate space. The low level of morphological evolution does not reflect the level of genetic differentiation reported by other investigators, suggesting that many species of Geomys may represent cryptic species.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
499
    499
  • Thumbnail: Page 
500
    500
  • Thumbnail: Page 
501
    501
  • Thumbnail: Page 
502
    502
  • Thumbnail: Page 
503
    503
  • Thumbnail: Page 
504
    504
  • Thumbnail: Page 
505
    505
  • Thumbnail: Page 
506
    506
  • Thumbnail: Page 
507
    507
  • Thumbnail: Page 
508
    508
  • Thumbnail: Page 
509
    509
  • Thumbnail: Page 
510
    510
  • Thumbnail: Page 
511
    511