You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Religious Attributions: Situational Factors and Effects on Coping
M. H. Miner and J. McKnight
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Vol. 38, No. 2 (Jun., 1999), pp. 274-286
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1387794
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Divine attributes, Christianity, Attribution theory, Health outcomes, Problem solving, Psychology of religion, Situational attribution, Psychological stress, Mental health outcomes, Sovereignty
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The religious attributions of 363 Presbyterian Congregational members were examined to see how they affected coping responses across a range of situations. We compared the multiple sufficient schemata (attributions to God or secular causes) and two proximal-distal models (distant God and secular causes; distant God plus God's direct control in some situations). Results failed to support the first two models but were consistent with direct and indirect divine causation in uncontrollable, severe, and pleasant situations. Simple theological arguments that committed Presbyterians would assert God's direct control because of belief in God's sovereignty were not upheld. There wer also small but significant direct and indirect effects of different religious attributions on adaptive coping. These findings point to the complexity of religious attributions and the need for a proximal-plus-distal model of religious attributions.
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion © 1999 Society for the Scientific Study of Religion