You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
A Nonstochastic Interpretation of Reported Significance Levels
David Freedman and David Lane
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
Vol. 1, No. 4 (Oct., 1983), pp. 292-298
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1391660
Page Count: 7
Preview not available
Tests of significance are often made in situations where the standard assumptions underlying the probability calculations do not hold. As a result, the reported significance levels become difficult to interpret. This article sketches an alternative interpretation of a reported significance level, valid in considerable generality. This level locates the given data set within the spectrum of other data sets derived from the given one by an appropriate class of transformations. If the null hypothesis being tested holds, the derived data sets should be equivalent to the original one. Thus, a small reported significance level indicates an unusual data set. This development parallels that of randomization tests, but there is a crucial technical difference: our approach involves permuting observed residuals; the classical randomization approach involves permuting unobservable, or perhaps nonexistent, stochastic disturbance terms.
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics © 1983 American Statistical Association