You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Psychologists and the Judicial System: Broader Perspectives
Donald N. Bersoff
Law and Human Behavior
Vol. 10, No. 1/2, The Ethics of Expert Testimony (Jun., 1986), pp. 151-165
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1393513
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Social psychology, Psychology, Child psychology, Legal evidence, Psychological research, Criminal psychology, Juries, Empirical evidence, Experimental psychology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This article traces the rise, fall, and current ambivalence in the use of social science data and psychological experts by the legal system. Several reasons are discussed for the less than perfect "marriage" between psychology and the law: normative philosophy of constitutional adjudication; overriding principles of the rules of evidence; irrelevancy to the courts of much of social science research; seduction of psychologists by attorneys who persuade experts to testify as advocates for a particular position rather than as objective scientists. These problems are placed in a legal and ethical framework and suggestions for remediation of these problems are offered.
Law and Human Behavior © 1986 Springer