You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
What Kind of Knowledge Does a Weak-Willed Person Have?: A Comparative Study of Aristotle and the Ch'eng-Chu School
Philosophy East and West
Vol. 50, No. 2 (Apr., 2000), pp. 242-253
Published by: University of Hawai'i Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1400144
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This comparative study argues that both Aristotle and the Ch'eng-Chu School deny that a weak-willed person truly and clearly knows what is best at the time of action, but their analyses of a weak-willed person's knowledge are rather different. It is shown that both Aristotle and the Ch'eng-Chu School believe that practical knowledge presupposes repeatedly acting on it and thus that the defect of the weak-willed person's knowledge cannot be overcome by purely cognitive training.
Philosophy East and West © 2000 University of Hawai'i Press