You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sexual Selection and Calling Behavior in the American Toad (Bufo americanus)
Brian K. Sullivan
Vol. 1992, No. 1 (Feb. 3, 1992), pp. 1-7
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1446530
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mating behavior, Toads, Sexual selection, Heart rate, Gender discrimination, Broadcasting industry, Breeding, Female animals, Body temperature, Advertising signs
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Mating system structure, variation in advertisement and release calls, and calling behavior were investigated during a three-year period in Bufo americanus in east-central Maine. Although the breeding season was relatively brief, chorus size was small, and males participated in chorus activity for an average of six or seven nights within a season. Pulse rate and duration of the advertisement call were significantly correlated with temperature, but neither frequency nor call rate was influenced by temperature over a 10 C range. Dominant frequency was the only advertisement call variable significantly (negatively) correlated with snout-vent length in one of two years for one of two populations studied. Similarly, dominant frequency was the only release call variable significantly (negatively) correlated with male size (snout-vent length and mass). Males exhibited consistency in both call rate and call duration as measured over a series of nights of chorus activity: repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was 0.52 for call duration and 0.24 for call rate. Females did not discriminate between high and low frequency calls in discrimination experiments; however, females did prefer calls broadcast at relatively high call efforts (rate × duration).