Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Sexual Size Dimorphism in Snakes Revisited

Richard Shine
Copeia
Vol. 1994, No. 2 (May 16, 1994), pp. 326-346
DOI: 10.2307/1446982
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1446982
Page Count: 21
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($12.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Sexual Size Dimorphism in Snakes Revisited
Preview not available

Abstract

Published and original data on the degree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) were collated for 374 species of snakes from eight families, to test for predicted associations between SSD and other aspects of reproductive biology. Data on the occurrence and form of male-male combat were also reviewed. Because phylogenetic conservatism was evident in most of the characteristics studied, the data were analyzed in two ways: (1) I looked for general patterns by treating each species as an independent unit; and (2) I superimposed the data onto a phylogenetic framework so that I could calculate independent contrasts within each lineage. Male-male combat has been reported in 124 species of snakes, and this combat takes many forms. For example, biting is common in nonvenomous species. Males grow larger, relative to conspecific females, in species with male-male combat than in species not recorded to show this behavior, and this association remains significant when analysis is restricted to independent phylogenetic contrasts. On a proximate level, the larger size of males in species with combat is due primarily to a prolongation of male growth after maturation. Fecundity advantages of larger body sizes in females may also influence SSD, because the degree of SSD correlates with the rate at which litter sizes increase with body size. The evolution of viviparity is associated with a consistent shift toward larger female size relative to male size. However, my analyses suggest that a previously documented correlation between SSD and geographic distribution is due to phylogenetic conservatism rather than to any functional relationship between the two variables.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[326]
    [326]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
327
    327
  • Thumbnail: Page 
328
    328
  • Thumbnail: Page 
329
    329
  • Thumbnail: Page 
330
    330
  • Thumbnail: Page 
331
    331
  • Thumbnail: Page 
332
    332
  • Thumbnail: Page 
333
    333
  • Thumbnail: Page 
334
    334
  • Thumbnail: Page 
335
    335
  • Thumbnail: Page 
336
    336
  • Thumbnail: Page 
337
    337
  • Thumbnail: Page 
338
    338
  • Thumbnail: Page 
339
    339
  • Thumbnail: Page 
340
    340
  • Thumbnail: Page 
341
    341
  • Thumbnail: Page 
342
    342
  • Thumbnail: Page 
343
    343
  • Thumbnail: Page 
344
    344
  • Thumbnail: Page 
345
    345
  • Thumbnail: Page 
346
    346