You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Mitochondrial DNA Phylogeography and Subspecies Issues in the Monotypic Freshwater Turtle Sternotherus odoratus
DeEtte Walker, William S. Nelson, Kurt A. Buhlmann and John C. Avise
Vol. 1997, No. 1 (Feb. 18, 1997), pp. 16-21
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1447835
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mitochondrial DNA, Haplotypes, Turtles, River basins, Genetics, Biological taxonomies, Ponds, Phylogeography, Population genetics, Enzymes
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Phylogeographic variation in mitochondrial (mt) DNA restriction sites is described for populations of the monotypic stinkpot turtle (Sternotherus odoratus) from the southeastern United States. Stinkpots display pronounced and hierarchical mtDNA phylogeographic differentiation, ranging from genetically shallow differences among local populations to genetically deep distinctions among regional assemblages of haplotypes. Both magnitude and general pattern of intraspecific mtDNA phylogeography in S. odoratus are remarkably similar to those in a related species (Sternotherus minor) that traditionally has been considered ditypic based on morphological and genetic appraisals. The pronounced phylogeographic population structure in S. odoratus effectively falsifies prior hypotheses that extensive dispersal and gene flow account for the morphometric conservatism among geographic populations. These findings also raise broader issues concerning the significance of subspecies designations in testudine systematics.