You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Temporal variability of water chemistry in flowing waters of the northeastern United States: does river size matter?
John Chételat and Frances R. Pick
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Vol. 20, No. 3 (September 2001), pp. 331-346
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1468032
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Rivers, River water, Floods, Streams, Statistical variance, Chemical suspensions, Bodies of water, Drainage basins, Groundwater, River basins
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
AbstractThe seasonal variability of discharge, water chemistry, suspended sediment, and suspended algal abundance was examined in temperate rivers of the northeastern United States to evaluate the accepted (but rarely tested) assumption that streams are more temporally variable than large rivers. Temporal variance of discharge and water-column characteristics was determined for 108 stations on 98 rivers with data measured between May to October of 1978 by the US National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN). Temporal variance of water-column characteristics increased in relation to the mean estimate of the variable (r2 = 0.69–0.93, p < 0.001) with the exception of pH (p > 0.05). River size, estimated by median discharge, had little effect (partial r2 = 0.01–0.02, p < 0.05) or no effect (p > 0.05) on the temporal variance of water-column characteristics after accounting for differences in the mean. In contrast, hydrological variability (measured by the coefficient of variation of daily discharge, flood frequency, number of months with floods) was negatively related with median discharge (r2 = 0.25–0.38, p < 0.001). When rivers were separated into regional drainage basins, hydrological variability was strongly related to median discharge in some regions (r2 = 0.45–0.76, p < 0.001) and not in others (p > 0.05). Temporal variance of water-column characteristics was not affected by river size within individual drainage basins. The intensity of upstream impoundment (measured by the number of impoundments and total impoundment storage volume) also negatively influenced the seasonal variability of discharge (r2 = 0.08–0.24, p < 0.01) but had little effect (partial r2 = 0.01–0.03, p < 0.05) or no effect (p > 0.05) on the temporal variance of water-column characteristics. Power functions are provided as guidelines for sampling design to estimate the number of samples required to obtain a mean with a given level of precision for each of the water-column characteristics. Nutrient status may be more important to consider than river size when determining sampling frequency for monitoring programs. On average, water chemistry is as variable in large rivers as in small ones.
Journal of the North American Benthological Society © 2001 The University of Chicago Press