You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Nutrient Limitation in Boreal Rich-Fen Vegetation: A Fertilization Experiment
Applied Vegetation Science
Vol. 7, No. 1 (May, 2004), pp. 119-132
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1478974
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Vegetation, Fertilization, Fens, Plants, Species, Soil nutrients, Biomass, Nitrogen, Biomass production, Plant growth
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Rich-fen vegetation influenced by hay-making in the Sølendet Nature Reserve, Central Norway, was fertilized with N, P and K in a full-factorial fertilization experiment to investigate the nutrient limitation of plant growth at both community and species levels. Above-ground biomass, shoot density and nutrient concentration were measured in several species and groups of species at three sites after two years of fertilization. At the community level, the results indicate multiple limitation by N and P in the two least productive rich-fen communities: one characterized by small sedges and herbs, and the other by high abundance of Menyanthes trifoliata and tall sedges. Increased nutrient availability had no effect on a more highly productive, tall-growing, spring-influenced community, indicating no nutrient limitation. The results at the species level correspond well with those at the community level, indicating multiple limitation by N and P in most of the dominant and sub-dominant species. However, P seems to limit growth more than N in Succisa pratensis, and N seems to limit growth more than P in Carex panicea. Furthermore, Eriophorum angustifolium seems to be limited by K. The results did not show which nutrient limits the growth of Carex dioica, C. lasiocarpa and Trichophorum cespitosum. Indications that growth in low-productive, boreal rich-fen communities is generally limited by P was not confirmed.
Applied Vegetation Science © 2004 Wiley