You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Early Reading Intervention for English Language Learners At-Risk for Learning Disabilities: Student and Teacher Outcomes in an Urban School
Diane Haager and Michelle P. Windmueller
Learning Disability Quarterly
Vol. 24, No. 4 (Autumn, 2001), pp. 235-250
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511113
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Teachers, At risk students, English language learners, Learning disabilities, Students, Professional development, Special needs students, Special education, Reading instruction, Urban schools
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Student and teacher outcomes following the first year of implementation of an early reading intervention project designed to improve literacy outcomes in one urban school are described. The intervention was delivered through ongoing supplemental reading instruction for English language learners (ELLs) at-risk of reading failure. Students at-risk for reading-related learning disabilities were identified using the "Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)," a performance-based reading assessment. Students at-risk and students with learning disabilities (LD) received supplemental small-group reading instruction provided by the classroom teacher and support personnel implementing an inclusive special education program. Results indicated positive growth for ELLs, with a disproportionately large percentage of students falling into the risk range. At-risk and LD students showed steady improvement, supporting the coupling of an inclusive special education program with reading intervention in the primary grades. Teacher reports indicated that professional development should be grounded in the reality of classroom experience.
Learning Disability Quarterly © 2001 Hammill Institute on Disabilities