You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Defining Reading Disability Using a Multifaceted Approach
Joyce Pereira-Laird, Frank P. Deane and Julie Bunnell
Learning Disability Quarterly
Vol. 22, No. 1 (Winter, 1999), pp. 59-71
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511152
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Learning disabilities, Reading difficulties, Child psychology, Intelligence quotient, Learning, Dyslexia, Disabilities, Wechsler scales, Reading comprehension, Academic learning
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study addressed the validity of using a five-stage multifaceted approach to defining reading disabilities. The selection criteria generally represented key features of the reading disability concept (e.g., intraindividual differences, low achievement, exclusionary criteria). The sample consisted of 204 reading disabled and 203 normally achieving Form 2 (junior high) students from New Zealand. Comparison of these two groups on motivational, cognitive, and metacognitive variables demonstrated the validity of the approach adopted in the current study for defining reading disabled children. Discriminant analyses revealed that 96.1% of the reading disabled and 95.1% of the normally achieving children were correctly classified. It is envisaged that the multifaceted working model discussed here for defining reading disabled individuals should stimulate renewed discussion as well as further refinement of the selection criteria.
Learning Disability Quarterly © 1999 Hammill Institute on Disabilities