You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Is IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Relevant in the Definition of Arithmetic Learning Disabilities?
Juan E. Jiménez González and Ana I. Garcia Espínel
Learning Disability Quarterly
Vol. 22, No. 4 (Autumn, 1999), pp. 291-301
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511263
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study was designed to test whether the criterion based on the IQ-achievement discrepancy is useful in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities (ALD). A sample of children with ALD, garden-variety (G-V) poor mathematics performance (i.e., the poor arithmetic performance of children of below-average intelligence is believed to be nondiscrepant, or in accordance with their lower cognitive capabilities) and normally achieving children were selected using the standard-score discrepancy method (i.e., the differences between IQ and achievement standard scores). All the groups were compared to determine whether there were differences in solving addition and subtraction word problems and in other cognitive abilities related to mathematics such as working memory. There were no significant differences between children with ALD and children with G-V poor mathematics performance in solving arithmetic word problems or on working memory tasks. The performance of both groups with arithmetic disabilities was significantly below that of normally achieving children. This means that the criterion based on the IQ-achievement discrepancy does not seem to be relevant for differentiating between children with ALD and children with G-V poor mathematics performance.
Learning Disability Quarterly © 1999 Hammill Institute on Disabilities