You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Quotation and Context: Sampling and John Oswald's Plunderphonics
Leonardo Music Journal
Vol. 7 (1997), pp. 17-25
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1513241
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Popular music, Musical timbre, Audio recordings, Digital samplers, Music composition, Musical rhythm, Composers, Music, Sound pitch, Melody
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although the music industry (not without inconsistency) has insisted that digital sampling is "theft," it is perhaps better viewed in historical and theoretical context as timbral quotation. Often the sample functions as a quote that is recontextualized but that nevertheless bears the weight of its original context. The author compares some attempts at creating a taxonomy for sampling use and concludes with a discussion of the controversial "plunderphonic" work of composer John Oswald. Oswald's work reveals an often overlooked aspect of contemporary popular music in the age of mechanical reproduction: his samples refer not only to specific songs (where they are recognizable), but also to the timbres associated with entire genres.
Leonardo Music Journal © 1997 The MIT Press