You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Long-Term Acclimation of Leaf Production, Development, Longevity and Quality Following 3 yr Exposure to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment during Canopy Closure in Populus
Penny J. Tricker, Carlo Calfapietra, Elena Kuzminsky, Raffaela Puleggi, Rachel Ferris, Miriam Nathoo, Laura J. Pleasants, Victoria Alston, Paolo de Angelis and Gail Taylor
The New Phytologist
Vol. 162, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 413-426
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1514512
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
• The effects of elevated CO2 on leaf development in three genotypes of Populus were investigated during canopy closure, following exposure to elevated CO2 over 3 yr using free-air enrichment. • Leaf quality was altered such that nitrogen concentration per unit d. wt (N mass) declined on average by 22 and 13% for sun and shade leaves, respectively, in elevated CO2. There was little evidence that this was the result of 'dilution' following accumulation of nonstructural carbohydrates. Most likely, this was the result of increased leaf thickness. Specific leaf area declined in elevated CO2 on average by 29 and 5% for sun and shade leaves, respectively. • Autumnal senescence was delayed in elevated CO2 with a 10% increase in the number of days at which 50% leaf loss occurred in elevated as compared with ambient CO2. • These data suggest that changes in leaf quality may be predicted following long-term acclimation of fast-growing forest trees to elevated CO2, and that canopy longevity may increase, with important implications for forest productivity.
The New Phytologist © 2004 New Phytologist Trust