You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Hypersegregation in the Twenty-First Century
Rima Wilkes and John Iceland
Vol. 41, No. 1 (Feb., 2004), pp. 23-36
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1515211
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Metropolitan areas, Racial segregation, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, African Americans, White people, Demography, Residential segregation, Segregation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
We used metropolitan-level data from the 2000 U.S. census to analyze the hypersegregation of four groups from whites: blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans. While blacks were hypersegregated in 29 metropolitan areas and Hispanics were hypersegregated in 2, Asians and Native Americans were not hypersegregated in any. There were declines in the number of metropolitan areas with black hypersegregation, although levels of segregation experienced by blacks remained significantly higher than those of the other groups, even after a number of factors were controlled. Indeed, although socioeconomic differences among the groups explain some of the difference in residential patterns more generally, they have little association with hypersegregation in particular, indicating the overarching salience of race in shaping residential patterns in these highly divided metropolitan areas.
Demography © 2004 Population Association of America