You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Foraging Ecology of the Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea), Great Egret (Ardea alba) and Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) in Response to Habitat, at 2 Greek Wetlands
Anastasios Dimalexis, Myrto Pyrovetsi and Stefanos Sgardelis
Vol. 20, No. 2 (1997), pp. 261-272
Published by: Waterbird Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1521692
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Foraging, Riverine habitats, Lakes, Meadows, Aquatic habitats, Biomass, Marshes, Freshwater fishes, Wading birds, Wetlands
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We studied the responses of 3 heron species, Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea), Great Egret (A. alba) and Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) to different foraging habitats in 2 Greek wetlands of international importance, Lakes Mikri Prespa and Kerkini. These lakes are different in their hydrology, productivity and vegetation cover. Parameters of foraging tactics-such as strike rate, foraging effort expended per min and effort expended per strike-as well as parameters of foraging efficiency-such as striking efficiency, captures per unit effort and biomass intake per unit effort-were analyzed in relation to habitat and lake. Each species adopted different tactics and achieved variable efficiencies in response to the particular lake, habitat conditions and prey characteristics. Little Egrets revealed the greatest plasticity in their foraging repertoire, especially with regard to their mobility and prey preference. Great Egrets and Grey Herons consumed larger amounts of biomass per unit effort than did Little Egrets, with Great Egrets achieving the highest striking efficiency. Riverine habitats proved to be more profitable than marshes for all 3 species, while wet meadows seemed to play a complementary role for herons' foraging.
Colonial Waterbirds © 1997 Waterbird Society