You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Drag Coefficients of Swimming Animals: Effects of Using Different Reference Areas
David E. Alexander
Vol. 179, No. 2 (Oct., 1990), pp. 186-190
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1541768
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Drag coefficient, Swimming, Animals, Surface areas, Species, Reynolds number, Hydrodynamics, Planforms, Crustaceans, Foxes
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The drag coefficient ( C D) is useful for comparing the hydrodynamic drag among different swimming animals. However, C D is calculated using an arbitrary reference area for which there is no uniform convention; both total surface area ("wetted area") and maximum cross-sectional area ("frontal area") are widely used. The choice of reference area can have a profound effect on calculations of drag coefficient. To illustrate this problem, drag measurements from two isopod crustacean species were used to calculate C D based on both wetted and frontal areas. Idotea wosnesenskii had a higher mean C D based on wetted area (0.084) than Idotea resecata (0.059), but a lower mean C D based on frontal area (0.95) compared to I. resecata (1.22); both differences are statistically significant. Given that there is no powerful hydrodynamic basis for choosing either reference area, and that conversions between wetted area C D and frontal area C D cannot accurately be made for complex shapes, I suggest reporting both wetted area and frontal area C D's wherever practical.
Biological Bulletin © 1990 Marine Biological Laboratory