You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Male-Female Association in the Spider Crab Inachus phalangium: The Influence of Female Reproductive Stage and Size
Journal of Crustacean Biology
Vol. 8, No. 1 (Feb., 1988), pp. 63-69
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1548431
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Female animals, Mating behavior, Crabs, Eggs, Body size, Crustaceans, Spiders, Folktales, Spermatozoa, Goodness of fit
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The distribution of Inachus phalangium (Decapoda: Majidae) on the sea anemone Anemonia sulcata was investigated from 1982 to 1984 in the coastal region of Banyuls-sur-Mer (southern France). Most adult crabs (64.5%) were found alone on an anemone, but groups of 2, 3, and 4 adults sharing an anemone were decreasingly frequent. Spider crabs were randomly distributed on the anemones; 79.5% of the occupied anemones held only one crab. In cases of multiple occupation of a given anemone, (1) heterosexual pairs were more frequent than could be expected for random association, and homosexual pairs less frequent, (2) reproductive males were paired more frequently than expected with females ready to spawn, and (3) adult males pairing with females ready to spawn were larger than solitary males or those males with females not yet ready to spawn. In multiparous females 27% of the variance in the number of eggs per brood was explained by body size; egg number was positively correlated with body size but varied strongly within the same body-size class. Assortative pairing for body size in pairs was not found, probably because any fitness advantage accruing to males in choosing large females is offset by the costs of longer seeking time and the loss of mating opportunities with smaller females.
Journal of Crustacean Biology © 1988 Brill