You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Clawed Lobster (Nephropidae) Diversity through Time
Journal of Crustacean Biology
Vol. 23, No. 1 (Feb., 2003), pp. 178-186
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1549871
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Lobsters, Species, Fossils, Species diversity, Rocks, Geology, Biological taxonomies, Seas, Paleontology, Sampling bias
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Clawed lobster diversity through time [Lower Cretaceous (Valanginian)-Recent] is compiled and interpreted herein. Species diversity trends are evaluated using raw numbers of species per geologic time unit (period, age) and also by using a variety of species-numbers normalization factors that address sampling biases. Species numbers are normalized for: 1) duration of time intervals (periods), 2) sedimentary rock exposure area per time intervals (periods), and 3) area under the Vail et al. (1978) sea-level curve (ages). The Vail curve method, new herein, normalizes for marginal/epicontinental sea coverage per age. By any measure; i.e., raw or normalized data, and over any time interval considered, shallow-dwelling (shelf depth) lobsters were significantly more diverse in the Cretaceous than in the Tertiary (e.g., 53 Cretaceous species vs. 16 Tertiary species, raw count; 18 Tertiary species if normalized for duration). Reduction in Tertiary lobster diversity seems due, in part, to mass extinction at the K/T boundary. However, lobster diversity rebounds in the Eocene, and it seems apparent that lower diversity of Tertiary lobsters is due more to post-Paleocene events than to K/T boundary events. The reduction in Tertiary fossil diversity seems largely explained by the lobsters' general abandonment of shelf depths in the Tertiary (ca. late Eocene-early Oligocene). Deep-dwelling lobsters are seldom collected as fossils, and their diversity history will never be known, but it seems clear that shelf-dwelling lobsters were significantly more diverse in the Cretaceous.
Journal of Crustacean Biology © 2003 Brill