You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Ecology and Behavior of the Gila Monster in Southwestern Utah
Daniel D. Beck
Journal of Herpetology
Vol. 24, No. 1 (Mar., 1990), pp. 54-68
Published by: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1564290
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Lizards, Shelters, Gila monsters, Body temperature, Reptiles, Foraging, Head, Ecology, Eggs, Animal nesting
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Activity patterns, behavior, food habits, and thermal biology were investigated by radiotelemetry in a population of banded Gila monsters in southwestern Utah. Twenty-seven Gila monsters were observed within a 2 km2 area. They fed on eggs and young mammals taken from nests. Quantities as large as 210 g, eaten in a single meal, did not appear to be envenomated. Activity peaked between late April and mid June, from 0800 to 1200 h. Distances traveled during activity bouts averaged 210 m (approximately 50 min), although individuals occasionally traveled over 1 km. Lizards were active on less than 10 days/month during their 90-day activity season, spending over 95% of their time below ground in shelters. This low energetic investment to activity is contrary to traditional descriptions of activity of lizards that forage on patchy prey. Gila monsters had a relatively low activity temperature (x̄ = 29.4 C) and at rest spent over 83% of the year at body temperatures of 25 C or below. Lizards occasionally basked near shelters in the spring. Several shelters were reused, some by more than one lizard, occasionally concurrently. Intraspecific interactions, including male combat, observed near shelters suggest that these helodermatids have a structured social system. Analysis of a 3-h fight between two large males revealed similarities with varanid lizard and crotaline snake combat, as well as similarities to combat in captive helodermatids.
Journal of Herpetology © 1990 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles