You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Some Thoughts on the Sense of Smell in Analogy to Language
Michael M. Benarie
Vol. 7, No. 1 (Winter, 1974), pp. 19-22
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1572731
Page Count: 4
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although chemoreception by the nose is very substance-specific, human odor perception exhibits characteristics in a way analogous to visual and auditory gestalt perception. That is, odor perception seems to result from a much more complex response than a simple one-to-one correspondence between the receptor sites and the molecular structure of the stimulant. Odor perception is considered by the author in analogy to a semantic information-conveying system. In animals, odor message interpretation is instinctive and fixed. At the human level some or all stimuli to the odor receptors have changing, contextual meaning. Their meaning can be modified by habit or by learning. The author postulates that sensory excitation due to pure chemical substances is similar to that due to words. They generally convey no meaning by themselves but only in context. This hypothesis suggests the adoption of techniques used in linguistics and cryptanalysis and the concept of olphemes, the odor perception equivalent of phonemes in language.
Leonardo © 1974 Leonardo