You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Self-Portraits as Presentations of Self
W. Ray Crozier and Paul Greenhalgh
Vol. 21, No. 1 (1988), pp. 29-33
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1578412
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Self portraiture, Self, Social psychology, Social theories, Motivation, Renaissance art, Social constructionism, Art exhibitions, Arts patronage, College students
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Questions concerning the psychological meanings of self-portraits are discussed in terms of three current social psychological theories that emphasize self-awareness, self-presentation, and the social construction of the self. The social constructionist perspective implies that self-portraits will have different meanings at different epochs due to changing conceptions of the self and the complex relationships between social and economic conditions, ideas about appearance and the significance of portraits. Self-presentation theory implies that self-portraits will be read in terms of motives for self-presentation. Some relevant findings are discussed from a study that asked students to attempt to distinguish between portraits and self-portraits made by the same artists. Respondents were more accurate with Modern than with Baroque pictures and seemed to base their identifications on imputed artists' intentions and the sitters' psychological expressions.
Leonardo © 1988 Leonardo