You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Evidence-Based Ethics and the Care of Premature Infants
The Future of Children
Vol. 5, No. 1, Low Birth Weight (Spring, 1995), pp. 197-213
Published by: Princeton University
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602515
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Infants, Neonatal intensive care, Birth weight, Intensive care, Health outcomes, Gestational age, Medical practice, Scientific ethics, Neonates, Neonatology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Despite the success of newborn intensive care, a vexing ethical question remains: Which preterm infants are so malformed, sick, or immature that newborn intensive care should not be administered? In an attempt to answer this question, this article examines current clinical practices and the persisting effects of the controversial Baby Doe regulations. The scientific evidence for current practices is critically analyzed in relation to fundamental ethical issues for marginally viable patients of any age. A variety of strategies--some highly provocative--is proposed and discussed to facilitate better-informed, better-justified, more broadly acceptable, and more fiscally responsible ethical decisions in the care of preterm infants.
The Future of Children © 1995 Princeton University