You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Covert Contraceptive Use: Prevalence, Motivations, and Consequences
Ann E. Biddlecom and Bolaji M. Fapohunda
Studies in Family Planning
Vol. 29, No. 4 (Dec., 1998), pp. 360-372
Published by: Population Council
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/172249
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article examines women's covert use of contraceptives, that is, their use of a method without their husbands' knowledge. Three questions are addressed: (1) How is covert use measured? (2) How prevalent is it? and (3) What are the factors underlying covert use? Existing studies are used together with survey and qualitative data collected in 1997 in an urban setting in Zambia from married women and their husbands. Women's covert use of contraceptives is estimated to account for 6 to 20 percent of all current contraceptive use, and it is more widespread when contraceptive prevalence is low. The multivariate analysis indicates that difficult spousal communication about contraception is the strongest determinant of covert use. Husbands' disapproval of contraception works through spousal communication rather than as a direct influence on covert use. Husbands' pronatalism had no significant effect. The article concludes with implications of covert use for reproductive health and family planning programs, especially women's (and men's) needs for confidential services.
Studies in Family Planning © 1998 Population Council