If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

The Effect of Household Wealth on Educational Attainment: Evidence from 35 Countries

Deon Filmer and Lant Pritchett
Population and Development Review
Vol. 25, No. 1 (Mar., 1999), pp. 85-120
Published by: Population Council
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/172373
Page Count: 36
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
The Effect of Household Wealth on Educational Attainment: Evidence from 35 Countries
Preview not available

Abstract

The authors use household survey data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 44 surveys (in 35 countries) to document different patterns in the enrollment and attainment of children from rich and poor households. They overcome the lack of income or expenditure data in the DHS by constructing a proxy for long-run wealth of the household from the asset information in the surveys, using the statistical technique of principal components. There are three major findings. First, the enrollment profiles of the poor differ across countries but fall into distinctive regional patterns: in some regions the poor reach nearly universal enrollment in first grade, but then drop out in large numbers leading to low attainment (typical of South America), while in other regions the poor never enroll in school (typical of South Asia and Western/Central Africa). Second, there are enormous differences across countries in the "wealth gap," the difference in enrollment and educational attainment of the rich and poor. While in some countries the difference in the median years of school completed of the rich and poor is only a year or two, in other countries the wealth gap in attainment is 9 or 10 years. Third, the attainment profiles can be used as diagnostic tools to suggest issues in the educational system, such as the extent to which low attainment is attributable to physical unavailability of schools.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
85
    85
  • Thumbnail: Page 
86
    86
  • Thumbnail: Page 
87
    87
  • Thumbnail: Page 
88
    88
  • Thumbnail: Page 
89
    89
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[90]
    [90]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[91]
    [91]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
92
    92
  • Thumbnail: Page 
93
    93
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[94]
    [94]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
95
    95
  • Thumbnail: Page 
96
    96
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[97]
    [97]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[98]
    [98]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
99
    99
  • Thumbnail: Page 
100
    100
  • Thumbnail: Page 
101
    101
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[102]
    [102]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[103]
    [103]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[104]
    [104]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[105]
    [105]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
106
    106
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[107]
    [107]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[108]
    [108]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[109]
    [109]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
110
    110
  • Thumbnail: Page 
111
    111
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[112]
    [112]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[113]
    [113]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
114
    114
  • Thumbnail: Page 
115
    115
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[116]
    [116]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[117]
    [117]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
118
    118
  • Thumbnail: Page 
119
    119
  • Thumbnail: Page 
120
    120