You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Effects of Role-Reversal during the Discussion of Opposing Viewpoints
Barbara F. Muney and Morton Deutsch
The Journal of Conflict Resolution
Vol. 12, No. 3 (Sep., 1968), pp. 345-356
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/172670
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study examined the effects of two different discussion methods, role-reversal and direct presentation of one's own viewpoint, upon the ease of reaching agreement and upon attitudinal change. Pairs of subjects, who had been selected for their extreme and opposed attitudes on a controversial issue, were instructed to attempt to reach a joint solution on the issue after an initial period of either role-reversal or self-presentation. Role-reversal proved no more effective than self-presentation in inducing attitudinal change; it was less effective on certain indices of conflict resolution. Both methods produced considerable understanding of the other's views and attitude change toward them. The pair's skill in role-reversal was related to attitude change toward one another. A hypothesis is offered explaining why role-reversal appeared more effective with one issue, while self-presentation was superior with the other.
The Journal of Conflict Resolution © 1968 Sage Publications, Inc.