You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Three-Party System in Dahomey: II, 1956-1957
The Journal of African History
Vol. 14, No. 3 (1973), pp. 491-504
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/180543
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political parties, Voting, Constituents, Territories, Political candidates, Police, Political elections, Executive committees, Communes, Governors
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
By the end of 1955, territorial politics in Dahomey were dominated by three parties, the P.R.D. of S. M. Apithy, the M.D.D. of Hubert Maga, and the U.D.D. of Justin Ahomadegbe and others. Each party relied upon electoral support in clearly defined regions: the P.R.D. depended on the south-east, the M.D.D. on the north, and the U.D.D. on the residual areas of central and south-western Dahomey. The U.D.D. claimed, however, to be a new kind of party, transcending the narrow regionalism of its rivals and commanding 'mass' support rather than the uncertain and conditional support provided by 'vote contractors'. The loi-cadre reforms of 1956-7 led to an intensification of party activity, since they provided for the creation of territorial executives founded on electoral majorities and at the same time introduced universal suffrage. The 1957 Territorial Assembly elections were therefore a testing-ground for the tactics and strength of the three parties. Under pressure from the P.R.D., the U.D.D. adopted selection procedures like those of its rival. Outside the main towns, its campaigning was similar, concentrating on local issues to the exclusion of the wider questions on which the U.D.D. had hoped to take its stand. Despite these tactical compromises, the U.D.D. failed to win a majority in the south, due apparently to the personal standing of Apithy (especially among recently enfranchised rural voters) and to the greater skill of the P.R.D. in calculating and manipulating ethnic support. Constitutional arrangements encouraged the development of regional parties to the detriment of would-be national parties and to the disadvantage of minorities.
The Journal of African History © 1973 Cambridge University Press