You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith
George J. Stigler
Journal of Political Economy
Vol. 84, No. 6 (Dec., 1976), pp. 1199-1213
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831274
Page Count: 15
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The criterion employed to judge successes and failures has been the acceptance or nonacceptance of Smith's theory by his immediate successors. This judgement has been supplemented with a more personal one of scientific fruitfulness. He had one overwhelming and proper success--the theorem on resource allocation under competition--and several minor successes. He also had one modest success that was improper (i.e., unfortunate)--the distinction between productive and unproductive labor. Smith's most important analytical failure was the hierarchy of employments of capital. Three failures that should have been successes receive special attention: his wage theory, his rent theory, and the analysis of the division of labor. The reasons for the differing fates of these theories are examined.
Journal of Political Economy © 1976 The University of Chicago Press