You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?
Herbert A. Simon
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 40, No. 4 (Dec., 1973), pp. 471-480
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/186282
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Normativity, Inductive reasoning, Logic, Intuition, Logical empiricism, Chess, Alphabets, Pattern theory, Psychology, Algorithms
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
It is often claimed that there can be no such thing as a logic of scientific discovery, but only a logic of verification. By 'logic of discovery' is usually meant a normative theory of discovery processes. The claim that such a normative theory is impossible is shown to be incorrect; and two examples are provided of domains where formal processes of varying efficacy for discovering lawfulness can be constructed and compared. The analysis shows how one can treat operationally and formally phenomena that have usually been dismissed with fuzzy labels like 'intuition' and 'creativity'.
Philosophy of Science © 1973 The University of Chicago Press