You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques
Wesley C. Salmon
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 64, No. 3 (Sep., 1997), pp. 461-477
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/188320
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Causal theory, Contrafactuals, Statistical relevance model, Causality, Molecules, Spacetime, Explanation theories, Baseball, Electric charge, Philosophy of science
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper discusses several distinct process theories of causality offered in recent years by Phil Dowe and me. It addresses problems concerning the explication of causal process, causal interaction, and causal transmission, whether given in terms of transmission of marks, transmission of invariant or conserved quantities, or mere possession of conserved quantities. Renouncing the mark-transmission and invariant quantity criteria, I accept a conserved quantity theory similar to Dowe's--differing basically with respect to causal transmission. This paper also responds to several fundamental constructive criticisms contained in Christopher Hitchcock's discussion of both the mark-transmission and the conserved quantity theories.
Philosophy of Science © 1997 The University of Chicago Press