You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Biological Function, Adaptation, and Natural Design
Colin Allen and Marc Bekoff
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 62, No. 4 (Dec., 1995), pp. 609-622
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/188555
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Teleology, Biological adaptation, Biology, Biological evolution, Ethology, Personality traits, Design, Natural selection, Design analysis, Evolution
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Recently something close to a consensus about the best way to naturalize the notion of biological function appears to be emerging. Nonetheless, teleological notions in biology remain controversial. In this paper we provide a naturalistic analysis for the notion of natural design. Many authors assume that natural design should be assimilated directly to function. Others find the notion problematic because it suggests that evolution is a directed process. We argue that both of these views are mistaken. Our naturalistic account does not simply equate design with function. We argue that the distinction between function and design is important for understanding the evolution of the physical and behavioral traits of organisms.
Philosophy of Science © 1995 The University of Chicago Press