You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Selectivity Bias in Male Wage Equations: Black-White Comparisons
Saul D. Hoffman and Charles R. Link
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Vol. 66, No. 2 (May, 1984), pp. 320-324
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1925835
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Coefficients, Selection bias, Net income, Estimation bias, Black white relations, Wages, Sampling bias, Population estimates, Employment, Labor supply
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Recent studies have documented a significant rise in the male black-white earnings ratio since the mid-1960s. The growing difference in nonemployment rates of blacks and whites clouds these optimistic findings. The basic question addressed in this paper is whether selectivity bias, caused by racial differences in employment rates, is a serious problem in the estimation of wage functions for adult males. For males age 21-34 we found no evidence of selectivity bias, but for the older cohort of males age 35-54, the results are quite different. For both whites and blacks, there is strong positive selection bias. It appears that biased estimates of several important coefficients are obtained using simple ordinary least squares procedures. The most interesting of these are the effect of low education for blacks.
The Review of Economics and Statistics © 1984 The MIT Press