You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Free and Slave Labor in the Antebellum South: Perfect Substitutes or Different Inputs?
Elizabeth B. Field
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Vol. 70, No. 4 (Nov., 1988), pp. 654-659
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1935829
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Slave labor, Farms, Slavery, Gangs, Crops, Production functions, Natural logarithms, Farm economics, Farming systems, Marginal products
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The substitutability between free and slave labor is examined and the permissibility of aggregating the two into a single labor variable is investigated, using a translog production function. Slaves on large cotton farms worked in gangs; free labor was not observed to do so. Despite this, previous research has aggregated free and slave labor and employed functional forms imposing strong restrictions on substitution. Estimation of the translog function shows that simple additive aggregation is not acceptable; on large farms, slaves and free labor were complements, while on small, nongang farms, they were substitutes.
The Review of Economics and Statistics © 1988 The MIT Press